The whole “black male/white female” gets a lot of media attention because it’s basically rare/abnormal, low-status, shameful for the family, and the unions typically end up divorce/separated (high levels of domestic violence since the black “community” is quite matriarchal and violence-prone).

In most Spanish-speaking nations, Spanish males impregnated Amerindian females to create Mestizos, whereas the Portuguese males preferred Black females and that explains the high levels of genetic European ancestry in Brazil, since they’re on average quadroon/octoroon (e.g.

evidenced by loose wavy hair strands, since black female hair is dry and nappy), but very inbred and not outbred at all (e.g.

Laura writes: I don’t think white women in general are more attracted to black men than white men.

No, you are probably seeing more of this rejection than is really there, but I would say many more white women than ever are attracted to black men, judging from the visibility of the phenomenon and the rates of interracial marriage. Feminism has attacked the virility of white men, not black men.

The white male provider keeping his wife in the kitchen is the oppressor, not the black man who never marries or supports women at all.

You don’t see feminists up in arms about rap singers who brag about throwing women against the wall.it’s some men having sex with a lot of women, like polyamorous unions).In addition, most families and ethnicities frown on black males marrying their daughters.Are white women, in general in modern society, more attracted to black men than white men?Thank you very much, I really look forward to your response.It’s transgressive and exciting and gets attention. It’s not white supremacy so much as the supremacy of those who benefit materially from uninhibited desire and are relentlessly selling it because it’s good for business.