A ‘simple’ word-based language (analytic) such as Chinese, for example, was placed on the bottom of the scale.
So unless you think proto-Uralic originated in Finland (highly unlikely) and that the proto-Uralic peoples were very closely related with the proto-Indo-Europeans, I think you and Põhjamaalane should stop being ignorant, start making sense and accept the damn facts: These are only general and quite hypothetical models to suggest how the Indo-European languages may have expanded.
We may conclude this section by laying to rest one fallacy that has often appeared in the past.
Only on Polako's plots when he wants to show our common Mongoloid admix :)I wasn't referring to Polako's plots.
On both 23and Me and de CODEme, Finns and Russians plot close with each other, and on de CODEme, Russians and Finns fall outside of the main European cluster; basically slightly detached from it, because of the minor Mongoloid admixture.
On European map we are not close at all, because it covers European affinity, 93% of our genes, while the global view weights the 7% Siberian admix. Yeah whatever, Finnish-Russian conflicts is not topic.
Anyway I noticed something interesting here, notice how well the lactose tolerance genotype mirrors the Indo-European languages in general and distribution of R-M17 in India and Iran (Baloch regions): if lactose tolerance originated amongst R-M17 men, lactose tolerance should have a higher presence in southern Anatolia too, with the Hittites, but it doesn't.
Elias Alucard Finland and Estonia represent the regions where Uralic speakers had a stronger presence after they migrated from the proto-Uralic urheimat.
Yeah, Russians have detectable Mongoloid admixture too, just like Finns, and you plot very close to each other on the global and intra-Euro PCA plots.
Turkic speakers are probably to be credited with the linguistic death of Tocharian as well as with the assimilation of numerous Iranian speakers across the Asiatic steppe, and ultimately with the effective collapse of Greek as the major language of Anatolia. Research into the essential structure of the world's languages revealed several basic types depending on how grammatical elements were indicated – inflected, agglutinative, and analytic.