While we can’t recommend them, we hope we can save you the trouble of experiencing them yourself.

Take it from us, e Harmony was just a worse version of

We still got a few bad messages, but the overall quality was better compared to the traditional dating sites we tested.

100 free dating sites like plenty of fish-57100 free dating sites like plenty of fish-39100 free dating sites like plenty of fish-54

At $46 per month it’s the most expensive option out there, but had the highest number of blank profiles.

Meanwhile, Plenty of Fish lives up to its name — we received twice as many messages compared to Ok Cupid.

Bumble offers an experience that’s very similar to Tinder, but with a twist: Women have to start the conversation.

If they don’t, the match will disappear after 24 hours, although you can upgrade to a paid account to keep matches around longer.

It organizes in-person events like speed dating, happy hours, and game nights for its members to help accelerate the search for “the one,” and it works — studies have shown it’s one of the top two sites to produce marriages.

(Match.com’s user base is slightly older, too, which may indicate more people who are ready to settle down.) However, Match lacks the robust matching algorithm of Ok Cupid — it came in fourth place for good matches in our testing — and isn’t as streamlined as Tinder or Bumble. We also tested three other sites: e Harmony, Plenty of Fish, and Zoosk.” and “What do you spend a lot of time thinking about?”) but also lets you rate how important a potential match’s answers to those same questions are.Even though we received fewer messages compared to other sites, we rated 40 percent “good” — the most out of the seven sites we tested.That’s in large part because only mutual matches can message each other: both parties have to “swipe right” before they can say hello, which cuts way down on spam.Matchmaker and online dating expert Carmelia Ray points out that “as a user, you want to have the most selection and options.